کارمند دانشگاهی به دلیل باورهای انسانی موفق به کسب معافیت از استفاده اجباری از هوش مصنوعی شد

منبع: Tom's Hardware

یک پژوهشگر دانشگاه کنتاکی توانست بر اساس قوانین مدنی ایالات متحده و به دلیل باورهای اومانیستی خود، معافیت مذهبی برای عدم استفاده اجباری از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی در محیط کار دریافت کند. وی معتقد است واگذاری تفکر به مدل‌های زبانی بزرگ با اصول اخلاقی و شخصیتی او در تضاد است.

دیوید دورمن، مدیر پژوهشی در دانشگاه کنتاکی، با استناد به عنوان هفتم قانون حقوق مدنی سال ۱۹۶۴ موفق شد از مقامات دانشگاه معافیتی دریافت کند که بر اساس آن مجبور به استفاده از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی در محیط کار نخواهد بود. او استدلال کرده است که واگذاری فرآیند تفکر و تصمیم‌گیری به مدل‌های زبانی مانند ChatGPT و Microsoft Copilot با باورهای اومانیستی او مغایرت دارد.

به گفته دورمن، فرآیند تفکر و تصمیم‌گیری شخصی بخش کلیدی رشد او به عنوان یک انسان اخلاقی است و برون‌سپاری این وظایف به ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی، توانایی وی را به عنوان یک عامل اخلاقی تضعیف می‌کند. انجمن اومانیست‌های آمریکایی (AHA) در این پرونده پشتیبانی‌های لازم را ارائه داده و این تصمیم را نخستین مورد از نوع خود برای محافظت از آزادی وجدان در برابر الزامات هوش مصنوعی دانسته است.

اگرچه دادگاه‌های فدرال اومانیسم را به عنوان یک جهان‌بینی واجد شرایط برای معافیت‌های مذهبی می‌دانند، اما این معافیت مشروط بر عدم ایجاد سختی نامعقول برای کسب‌وکار کارفرما است. بر این اساس، اگرچه دورمن شخصاً نیازی به استفاده از هوش مصنوعی ندارد، اما همچنان موظف است در جلسات کاری شرکت کرده و با همکارانی که از این فناوری استفاده می‌کنند همکاری نماید.

گزارش اصلی و جزئیات بیشتر در Tom's Hardware. مشاهده خبر در منبع اصلی
English

Man granted first-of-its-kind religious exemption against mandatory AI use at work — Humanist argues that offloading his thinking to LLMs violates his beliefs, Title VII accommodation protects employee

David Durman, a research administrator at the University of Kentucky (UK), has successfully argued that using AI violates his beliefs as a humanist and has received Title VII religious accommodation from university officials not to use the technology. According to the Religion News Service (RNS) , Durman believes in "the human part of life," which includes making his own decisions. However, he says that when the UK…

Man granted first-of-its-kind religious exemption against mandatory AI use at work — Humanist argues that offloading his thinking to LLMs violates his beliefs, Title VII accommodation protects employee

David Durman says that he's unwilling to outsource his thinking to AI tools.

David Durman, a research administrator at the University of Kentucky (UK), has successfully argued that using AI violates his beliefs as a humanist and has received Title VII religious accommodation from university officials not to use the technology. According to the Religion News Service (RNS), Durman believes in "the human part of life," which includes making his own decisions. However, he says that when the UK asked its employees to use AI, he felt that doing so would mean outsourcing his thinking to tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, thus violating his deeply held beliefs.

“The process and work involved in thinking through situations, through my work, through my ethics, through the way I handle other people, is a key component in being able to develop myself as a moral person,” Durman told RNS in an interview. “And offloading that labor, regardless of whether it’s taxing or not, is undercutting my ability to be a moral actor.” Because of this, the research administrator was granted a Title VII exemption under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. While humanism is often a non-religious philosophy or a worldview, federal courts have ruled that it qualifies as a religion.

The American Humanist Association (AHA) assisted Durman with his request for the accommodation. “This is the first of its kind at the AHA and for humanism generally to exempt those who see AI use as flying in the face of their freedom of conscience,” AHA staff attorney Alexandria Huiskens said to RNS. She also added, “For us, humanism is a comprehensive way of life. It’s built on inherent worth and dignity, and everyone should have room to exercise this comprehensive way of life at work the same way Christians do, or Muslims do.”

It should be noted that while anyone can request a Title VII exemption, it will only be granted if the applicant has a deep moral conviction that could count as an article of faith. Aside from that, the law also states that the request should not place an “undue hardship on the employer’s business.” So, even though Durman is no longer personally required to use AI tools for his tasks, he is still expected to attend meetings and cooperate with colleagues who use AI or to submit materials to AI tools, as needed.

AI use in corporate settings has been one of the biggest questions ever since LLMs exploded in popularity with ChatGPT. While AI proponents have said that the technology would increase productivity multiple times, reports say that corporate America, except for Big Tech, is not seeing any financial returns. Even so, about half of all U.S. employees now use AI one way or another at work, even as many executives remain uncertain about AI’s return on investment. But as for Durman, he says that the fact that Americans are already thinking about the impact of AI is a good thing, and that he hopes that his story would help others who’d rather not be forced to use the technology.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

Source report: Tom's Hardware.

گزارش فارسی این خبر با کمک هوش مصنوعی و فقط بر اساس اطلاعات منتشرشده در منبع تهیه شده است.