ایجاد ارزش واقعی در هوش مصنوعی سازمانی با استفاده از لایه زمینه کسب‌وکار

منبع: MIT Technology Review

بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که با وجود استفاده گسترده شرکت‌ها از هوش مصنوعی، بخش کمی از آن‌ها به ارزش‌های تحول‌آفرین دست می‌یابند. دلیل این امر فقدان لایه زمینه مناسب برای درک ساختار کسب‌وکار توسط هوش مصنوعی است.

سازمان‌های مختلف در سراسر جهان از ابزارها و پلتفرم‌های هوش مصنوعی استفاده می‌کنند، اما نتایج نظرسنجی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که تنها بخش کوچکی از شرکت‌ها توانسته‌اند ارزش واقعی و تحول‌آفرینی از این فناوری استخراج کنند. بسیاری از سازمان‌ها هنوز در مرحله اجرای آزمایشی یا استفاده از دستیارهای چت هستند و در تبدیل قابلیت‌های هوش مصنوعی به نتایج ملموس با چالش روبرو هستند.

کارشناسان معتقدند مشکل اصلی توانایی مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی نیست، بلکه کمبود لایه زمینه یا همان درک ساختار و فرآیندهای درون‌سازمانی است. بدون وجود یک زیرساخت معماری که داده‌ها و سیستم‌های کسب‌وکار را به شکلی قابل فهم برای هوش مصنوعی ترجمه کند، مدل‌ها نمی‌توانند تصمیمات دقیقی بر اساس نیازهای واقعی سازمان اتخاذ کنند.

ایجاد این لایه زمینه به عنوان پلی میان سامانه‌های سازمانی و مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی عمل می‌کند و به عوامل خودمختار اجازه می‌دهد تا با درک درست از محیط کار، عملکرد بهینه‌تری داشته باشند و بازگشت سرمایه مناسبی را برای شرکت‌ها به ارمغان بیاورند.

گزارش اصلی و جزئیات بیشتر در MIT Technology Review. مشاهده خبر در منبع اصلی
English

Creating AI value with enterprise context

Across a business, any number of AI platforms, systems, and tools may be at work simultaneously—for example, AI-powered customer platforms, conversational assistants, and workflow and process automation tools. Each one is sophisticated, advanced, and quick to respond. But, when set to work, the outcomes and actions that emerge may be wrong, confused, or lacking a…

Sponsored

Creating AI value with enterprise context

How establishing a company brain can support more accurate, cost-effective AI and autonomous agents.

In association withAtlan

Across a business, any number of AI platforms, systems, and tools may be at work simultaneously—for example, AI-powered customer platforms, conversational assistants, and workflow and process automation tools. Each one is sophisticated, advanced, and quick to respond. But, when set to work, the outcomes and actions that emerge may be wrong, confused, or lacking a proper understanding of the business. Many organizations find themselves in this situation—and it could be one of key reasons they struggle to extract returns on their AI investments.

An MIT Technology Review Insights poll finds that while every organization surveyed is using AI today to some degree, fewer than one in five (16%) are extracting transformative value from their deployments. The largest percentage of respondents (40%) say they are seeing moderate gains in specific tasks or teams, while 21% report meaningful gains, leaving 23% that are seeing minimal returns or none at all.

Companies are mostly still piloting AI use cases (according to 38% of respondents) or using it to assist employees’ work with tools like co-pilots or chat assistants (35%). Just 12% of enterprises have AI agents in production and 3% say they are using AI to do most of the work in key processes.

“There’s a big gap between what the models are capable of and how the models are actually being useful inside organizations,” says Prukalpa Sankar, co-founder of Atlan. “For every real-life intent and purpose, artificial general intelligence is already here. It’s just not really useful in most companies today.”

The missing layer, Sankar says, is context, or how well AI understands a business. A context layer is the architectural infrastructure that sits between an organization’s business systems (for example, systems of record and data, and its AI platforms). It translates enterprise intelligence into governed, machine-usable context for AI agents or models and helps knowledge compound. “Without a context layer for AI, it’s almost like you’re hiring the smartest intern in the world, blindfolding them, and throwing them into your organization,” Sankar says.

This content was produced by Insights, MIT Technology Review’s custom content arm, not its editorial staff. It was researched and written by humans, with any AI tools that may have been used limited to production processes under human oversight.

Deep Dive

Artificial intelligence

Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason

Ten years after AlphaGo’s match against Go champion Lee Sedol, today’s AI still isn’t tapping into the machinery that made that win possible.

“We were looking at it wrong”: The explosive claim that’s upended the AI world

An exclusive interview with Nick Cammarata, the researcher whose 26,000-word viral blog post has AI safety folks celebrating.

Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype

Breathless claims about AGI and new capabilities fall apart pretty quickly under scrutiny.

The US spent billions on border surveillance. Why can’t it catch people before they die?

Surveillance towers, increasingly powered by AI, promised faster responses to crossings. Our investigation of deaths near the towers found they are failing to deliver.

Stay connected

Get the latest updates from

MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Source report: MIT Technology Review.

گزارش فارسی این خبر با کمک هوش مصنوعی و فقط بر اساس اطلاعات منتشرشده در منبع تهیه شده است.